Figma Make Built 100 Landing Pages in 30 Minutes: 2026
Figma's text-to-design product is now production-grade. The honest answer for freelance designers is somewhere between 'no, you're fine' and 'yes, the volume tier is gone.'
The Delivvo team· May 8, 2026 7 min read
Figma Make went from limited preview to general availability in 2025, with a 2026 roadmap that pushes deeper into multi-page generation, design-system-aware output, and code export. For freelance designers, the experience of watching it ship 100 reasonable landing pages in 30 minutes is sobering. The honest assessment of what it means for a freelance design practice is more nuanced than "designers are cooked."
This is the post about the parts that are cooked, the parts that aren't, and how to reposition.
What Figma Make actually does well in 2026
Figma Make takes a text prompt and produces a full Figma file with multiple frames, real components from your design system if you connect one, and content tailored to the prompt. The current production version handles:
Landing pages, marketing pages, blog post layouts, pricing pages.
Multi-screen onboarding flows for fairly conventional patterns.
Component variants and responsive variations of any of the above.
Output that maps onto a configured design system rather than generic primitives.
The quality of any one of these is "decent template." Per Figma's Config 2025 keynote, Make's primary design objective was "production-grade output for high-volume work" — explicitly not "replace senior designers." That positioning is honest. The output is closer to what a junior designer would ship in a templated brief than to senior craft.
The shock for freelance designers is not the quality. It's the *volume*. A practice that used to charge $400 for a "quick landing page" template, billed three a week, now competes with a tool that ships 100 prompts in half an hour. The volume tier of design work has the same shape that volume tier of writing did after GPT-3.
Keep reading
What this compresses
Three categories are clearly compressed in 2026:
Template-grade page design. Single-purpose landing pages, lead magnet pages, basic blog templates, simple dashboards, and conventional multi-page flows. The buyer for this work is now mostly served by Make plus 30 minutes of human polish, often by an in-house marketer rather than a freelance designer.
Quick mockups for stakeholder buy-in. "Show me three directions" used to be a billable phase. It's now generated in the meeting. The freelancer is hired to do the work *after* the direction is picked, not for the directions.
Component-style screen production at scale. Spec'ing out 30 product screens that vary by feature flag, plan tier, or empty state is a job that used to take a week. Make plus a configured design system does it in a session.
If your practice was built on volume — many medium-stakes pages produced quickly with a known visual approach — the floor has dropped sharply. Per the AIGA Design Census 2025, freelance designers reported the steepest rate compression in this segment, mirroring the writing market's commoditized blog tier.
A clean desk with a tablet showing UI mockups and a notebook open to design notes
What this does not compress
Six categories are roughly untouched, and at least three are paying *more* in 2026 than they did pre-Make:
Brand identity work. Logo systems, type pairings, color systems, brand voice integration. AI-generated brand identity remains visibly off — clients see it, internal teams see it, the design press sees it. Per Brand New's 2025-2026 review, the brand-identity studios reporting the strongest year are those leaning into very-human, very-considered work that AI cannot replicate.
Product design at the system level. Designing a real software product — flows, states, edge cases, accessibility, system thinking — is a different job from generating a screen. Make does not do this. Senior product designers are billing more in 2026 than they did in 2024, partly because the cost of *not* having one in the room has become more visible (the AI ships fast; the AI also ships incoherent product fast).
Design system architecture. Building the design system that Make generates *from* is a job that has expanded. Companies need cleaner, more constrained, more semantically-tagged systems for AI tools to produce good output. Freelance design system specialists are the cleanest 2026 freelance design specialty — high demand, sharp delta over generalists.
Workshops, strategy, and research. Anything that requires a real human conversation. Stakeholder workshops, customer research synthesis, design strategy decks. AI can support, not replace.
High-stakes consumer-facing work. Mobile app interfaces for shipped products with real customers. The bar is too high; the consequences of bad design too large; AI output is too templated.
Anything illustration-led. Editorial illustration, complex graphic design, motion design. AI tools exist here too, but design-illustration freelancers report the smallest 2026 rate compression of any category.
The bifurcation, in numbers
Putting numbers on it from public surveys (AIGA, Dribbble's 2025 Pricing Report, Toptal's 2025 freelance design data):
Volume design freelancers (template pages, simple dashboards): rates compressed 20–40% from 2024 to 2026.
Generalist UX/product designers: roughly flat.
Brand identity specialists: rates up 10–25%.
Design system specialists: rates up 30–60% from a low base.
Senior product designers (consumer): rates up 10–20%.
The pattern, again, is that AI compressed *commodity* work and expanded *specialist* work. Same shape as the writing market, same shape as the development market. The market is showing a remarkably consistent answer about what AI does to creative-knowledge work.
What to do if you're a freelance designer in 2026
If your portfolio is mostly landing-page and template work, the volume tier is structurally compressed. Two paths: specialize into one of the expanding categories above (brand identity, design systems, senior product), or reposition the same work as "we ship the AI's first draft to production-grade" — which requires you to be fast at editing AI output, not generating from blank page.
If you're a generalist product designer, the market is calibrated in your favor. Find the verticals (healthcare, fintech, regulated industries) where AI design output has compliance or accessibility risk and the buyer needs human judgment.
If you're already a brand or design-system specialist, raise rates. The market is paying more for what you do, and the supply of competent specialists has not grown as fast as the demand from AI-using companies.
The thing that does not work: positioning as "I make beautiful Figma files." That language has been quietly drained of commercial meaning. The relevant positioning in 2026 is around outcomes (conversion, retention, system coherence) rather than artifacts.
Pricing in the new market
The volume design market is gone, but the *budgets* haven't shrunk in aggregate — they've redistributed. Companies that used to spend $20K with a freelance designer for 10 landing pages now spend $5K with a designer for AI-output editing on 30 landing pages, plus $25K on a brand or system specialist for the once-a-quarter strategic work.
The freelance designers thriving in 2026 are positioned for the second budget, not the first. If you're stuck competing for the first budget, you're competing with Make + an in-house marketer who has 30 minutes free.
The other structural shift: freelance designers are increasingly bundling the design work with a clean client experience — a single branded portal where briefs, files, deliverables, and approvals live. The polish of the engagement *around* the design becomes a signal of quality when the design itself is harder to differentiate from AI output.
FAQ
Q: Should I just refuse to use Figma Make?
No, and the freelancers who do are mostly losing rates to those who use it well. The right framing is: Make is a junior designer that ships fast, makes mistakes, and needs supervision. Use it that way.
Q: What about other AI design tools — Galileo, Uizard, v0?
Galileo and Uizard are smaller, with similar positioning to Figma Make. v0 (from Vercel) is excellent specifically for code-output design (React + Tailwind), which makes it the closest thing to a "designer + dev hybrid" tool — interesting for freelancers who already work the dev/design boundary. None replaces Make's integration with the file format clients already work in.
Q: How do I prove my work isn't AI-generated to clients who care?
You don't usually need to. The people paying premium rates for design work in 2026 understand AI is in the workflow; they're paying for judgment, not raw production hours. If a client specifically wants "no AI used," it's almost always a contract clause for compliance reasons (medical device, regulated industries) and you should price accordingly.
Q: Should I be worried about Figma's roadmap?
Each release of Make compresses the next layer of commodity design work and expands the value of judgment, system thinking, and craft. If you're positioned on judgment, future releases help you. If you're positioned on raw production volume, the next release will compress your rate further.
Q: Is the AIGA / Dribbble data reliable on this?
Survey data on freelance rates is always imperfect. The directional consistency across AIGA, Dribbble, Toptal, and the Editorial Freelancers Association (for writing) is what gives confidence in the bifurcation pattern, not any single survey.
Delivvo gives freelance designers a single branded portal for briefs, file delivery, contracts, and invoices — so the engagement around the design work signals the same level of seriousness your specialty does. See how it works →
