Spatial Design Freelance Rates Split in 2026: Vision Pro 2

Those pilots aren't built by Apple. They're built by spatial design and engineering specialists — many of them freelance — who get hired because the in-house design teams at these companies don't have visionOS native experience.

The visionOS app catalog itself is small relative to mobile. As of Q1 2026, native visionOS apps numbered around 4,200 — a tiny set against the 1.5M iOS apps that run as compatibility layers, per Treeview's XR market statistics report. Native apps — the kind enterprise pilots want — are scarce, and the freelance pool that builds them is the bottleneck.

The 2026 rate card

The published Toptal benchmark for 2026 puts AR/VR and game-engine specialists at $275-$450/hr at the senior tier — tracked by the Hire In South pricing analysis of Toptal. The blended Toptal hourly rate sits at $60-$150/hr, so the spatial premium is roughly 2-3x at the median and up to 5-6x at the top.

Compare that to mobile app dev. Median freelance rates for mobile app development in 2026 are $61-$80/hr, per Arc.dev's mobile development rate page. The gap between "build a working iOS app" and "build a visionOS-native enterprise pilot" is roughly 4-5x at top tier.

Where the premium concentrates:

1. visionOS-native engineering. SwiftUI, RealityKit, ARKit. The smallest pool, the highest rate.
2. 3D motion and asset design with Apple toolchain literacy. Reality Composer Pro, USD asset pipelines, integration with the engineer's RealityKit code.
3. Unity AR/VR generalists. Bigger pool, broader employer base — but still well above mobile-app dev median.
4. UX design with spatial-affordance fluency. Designers who understand depth, occlusion, gaze targeting, and the hand-tracking gestural model.

What does not pay the premium: cross-platform AR work. Cross-platform iOS/Android AR can't directly leverage visionOS-only APIs without writing native bridges, and the rate stays close to general mobile dev.

What the work actually looks like

The 2026 spatial freelance engagements that pay top rates fall into a small number of repeatable patterns:

• Enterprise training simulations. Manufacturing companies, airlines, healthcare providers building immersive training scenarios. Engagement size: $80K-$200K, 10-16 weeks.
• Product visualization. B2B sales teams handing buyers a spatial walkthrough of an industrial machine, a building, a vehicle interior. Size: $40K-$120K.
• Design tooling integrations. Engineering and architecture firms wanting visionOS access to their Revit, AutoCAD, or proprietary CAD models. Size: $50K-$150K.
• Internal-tool prototypes. A Fortune 500 wanting to test whether Vision Pro is worth a wider rollout. Size: $25K-$60K, 4-8 weeks.

Spatial-design freelance shops — Magnopus, Trojan Horse, others — have scaled headcount accordingly. Magnopus, per Tracxn's profile, reached around 218 employees across four continents by February 2026. The shops absorb a meaningful share of the senior-tier work, but the engagements above are still well-suited to solo or two-person freelance teams who can deliver one tight pilot end-to-end.

What's risky about pricing into this market

The size of the install base is the obvious risk. If Vision Pro 2's shipment numbers don't accelerate and Quest Pro 2 stays delayed, the enterprise pilots could plateau by late 2026. Statista's Vision Pro shipment forecast — available here — projects gradual growth through 2028 but no near-term inflection.

The right way to position around that risk:

• Don't bet the year on one Fortune-500 pilot. The pilot pays well, but enterprise procurement cycles slip. Run two or three pilots in parallel, not back-to-back.
• Combine spatial with adjacent specialties. SwiftUI + visionOS, Unity + Quest, USD asset pipeline + 3D motion. The gigs that bridge two specialties have the most repeat-buyer pull.
• Build a portfolio asset, not just case studies. A visionOS demo that other freelancers and recruiters point to compounds — case studies behind NDAs don't.

The pattern echoes the Apple Intelligence iOS rate split we covered earlier: a small, deeply integrated platform specialty at the top of the rate card, well above the cross-platform median.

Geographic notes

Most of the high-rate work in 2026 sits in the US (Seattle, Bay Area, NYC, Atlanta), the UK, Germany, the Nordics, South Korea, and Japan. The UAE and Saudi enterprise market is real but smaller — fund-of-fund-driven projects in tourism, museum, and retail spaces, not at Fortune-100 scale. Latin American and Indian rates are about half the US senior rate even on equivalent work, mirroring the broader rate pattern across freelance development.

Time-zone proximity to the buying enterprise still matters more than the spatial-computing posters suggest — the iteration loops on these pilots are tight and async-only collaboration runs into trouble fast.

Delivvo gives spatial design and engineering specialists a single branded portal for the proposal, the fixed-fee discovery contract, the asset and prototype delivery, and the milestone invoicing on $80K-$200K engagements — so when you're charging $300/hr to ship a Fortune 100 visionOS pilot, the engagement looks like a senior firm and not a one-person LinkedIn page. See how it works →

The shorter version

The spatial computing rate split in 2026 isn't about volume. The install base is small. Quest Pro 2 didn't ship. The premium concentrates on the narrow band of freelancers who can deliver Fortune-100 visionOS pilots — and the rate card has them at $275-$450/hr at the top of the senior tier. That is where the work is.

Keep reading